Sensible Erection | Don't Tread On Me, Tread On Her Instead.

Tuesday, 26 October 2010

Don't Tread On Me, Tread On Her Instead.

quote [ As the candidates arrived, a group of Paul supporters pulled a female MoveOn member to the ground and held her there as another Paul supporter stomped on the back of her head and neck.

The whole thing was caught on video. ]

One of the Rand Paul supporters that dragged her to the ground was wearing a "Don't Tread On Me" pin.

Official Rand Paul campaign statement on the incident in extended.

"We understand that there was an altercation outside of the debate between supporters of both sides and that is incredibly unfortunate. Violence of any kind has no place in our civil discourse and we urge supporters on all sides to be civil to one another as tensions rise heading toward this very important election. We are relieved to hear that the woman in question was not injured."

[politics] [by assbastard@11:15amGMT] [+10 WTF]

Comments

lilmookieesquire said @ 12:00pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:2 Good]
Huh? It's almost doing her a favor- politically and financially.
I hope she sues the living fuck out if him, any organization he's linked to, and it helps fuck up his campaign. Here's to hoping the damage is superficial and can only be cured with copious amounts if a life long medical marajuana bill supported by this ass munch (though he's likely poor and unemployed decrying state welfare while he's on it).

That's not how you treat people and tht's not how you participate in the political process.

Fuck this group of people.

If I was Ron Paul I'd be down there bitch slapping them.

oddzer said @ 12:34pm GMT on 26th Oct
And it could have been a great opportunity for Rand Paul to look a little bit less crazy by deriding the violent behavior and admonishing the men.

But that'd probably lose him favor among his constituency, wouldn't it...

KingPellinore said @ 12:37pm GMT on 26th Oct
The most he's said about the incident is that it was "unfortunate".

assbastard said @ 12:47pm GMT on 26th Oct
i put the statement in the extended.

bigdummy said @ 1:14pm GMT on 26th Oct
I like your post title.

cb361 said @ 1:34pm GMT on 26th Oct
I thought it was going to be something to do with 1984. "Do it to her! Do it to her! Not me! her! I don't care what you do to her. Tread on her, tread on her. Not me! Her! Not me!"

ahPook said @ 12:15pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:4]
This is political debate in America now.

KropperPrime said @ 2:25pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:2 Underrated]
What do you expect? Something smart?

You need smart people to do that.

Gn0me said @ 7:03pm GMT on 26th Oct
world fulla Fredos

Naruki said @ 7:56pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Underrated]
Now? These throwbacks have always existed. Everywhere.

But yeah, they are gaining a little more prominence lately than they should. The real problem is with the stunning lack of scandal associated with their criminal actions.

If they were liberals, they'd be tarred and feathered by now.

bigdummy said @ 1:14pm GMT on 26th Oct
I live in the north east - we are pretty liberal up here. None the less, there is a local tea party chapter in my city and they like to stand by the road waving the usual illiterate, retarded tea party signs. So thanks to these southern fucks, next time one of my local fucks waves the sign saying "honk if you hate socialism" at my car, I will feel totally justified running the fat asshole over.

EPT said @ 1:33pm GMT on 26th Oct
I encountered some Rand Paul crazies in Boston. After bursting out in peals of laughter seeing their "Britain started WWII" posters, I was handed some literature which I shakingly promised to read later.

Which I did.

Cue more peals of honest laughter as Rand Paul's pamphletts suggest that Prince Philip is some kind of machiavellian mastermind that has the world's currencies dancing on a string. Prince Philip, for fuck's sake!

If that's what he uses to promote himself, then absolutely nothing he says can be taken as having any worthwhile basis or thought. Man, I was embarrassed to have to share the same street as those credulous idiots.

KingPellinore said @ 1:36pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Funny]
"Honk if you can spell socialism"

loomspace said @ 2:19pm GMT on 26th Oct
"Honk if you respond to hate with hate"

BlutStein1984 said @ 1:34pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:4 Underrated]
Regardless of your political background, everyone should agree that this man needs to be charged to the fullest extent of the law.

KingPellinore said @ 1:37pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Insightful]
These men. A group held her down while another individual did the kicking.

Spleen23 said @ 3:48pm GMT on 26th Oct
and another person recorded the whole thing instead of doing something.

oddzer said @ 4:26pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:2 Underrated]
Recording this incident is the best thing that anyone could possibly have done.

Spleen23 said @ 5:27pm GMT on 26th Oct
after the fact.

Before the fact, possible gangbeating while being held down on the ground vs. someone recording you for possible future lawsuits...

I'd would rather risk the people attacking me getting away with it then haveing me risk crippleing injuries on camera.

f00m@nB@r said @ 9:49pm GMT on 26th Oct
If you're as scrawny as I am, you would not physically intervene, either.

In a mob:
1. Point to one specific person, make eye contact, and tell them to call for help. Indeterminate pleas -- "Someone call the police" -- are ineffectual.
2. Document that shit.

Naruki said @ 7:14pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1]
But especially of your political background, Blut. These people were making you look bad, not me.

BlutStein1984 said @ 7:32pm GMT on 26th Oct
The bastard stepped on a woman's head. Go fuck yourself.

Naruki said @ 7:54pm GMT on 26th Oct
Let me fix your deliberate omission:

The conservative bastard stepped on a woman's head.

His name is Tim Profitt, by the way.

Oh, I'll take you up on that last comment. Just need to head over to the latest porn post...

structured_spirits said @ 9:03pm GMT on 26th Oct

Underpants Gnomes said @ 12:02am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Funny]
Phase 1: knock her down & stomp her head
Phase 2: ?
Phase 3: Tim Profitt!

BlutStein1984 said @ 12:38am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:2 Underrated]
You are why this country sucks. Everyone agrees what this man did was horrible and you want to place labels on it for personal gain. Kindly, go fuck yourself.

Naruki said @ 1:08am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:-2 Flamebait]
No, I'm pretty sure YOU are the reason this country sucks. Heck, the whole universe. Yep, all you.

Don't get me wrong, I'm glad you are doing the right thing that even Rand Paul couldn't bring himself to do. You get full ups for that.

But you are still a member of the political group predominantly associated with domestic terrorism and racism and wild fiscal self-destruction, without actually putting those in its talking points memos.

Thus every time one of your guys reinforces that stereotype, you share the black eye. And it's pretty damn rare for your side to act all egalitarian when it's the other side who did something fucked up.

So forgive me if I remain cautious about your sudden outburst of "we're all together in condemning that guy, since his party affiliation had absolutely nothing at all to do with his actions". Give me time, and a few more examples. I'll come around.

KingPellinore said @ 1:51am GMT on 27th Oct
Oh, piss off. I'll preface this by saying you and I agree on most things politically, but the problem is that you vilify anyone with a cursory disagreement to your own views that YOU are part of the problem, rather than the solution. You lump anyone who votes Republican with these thugs and that is just the sort of mentality that these thus have, just reversed.

Naruki said @ 4:02am GMT on 27th Oct
Apparently you are Reading Comprehension Challenged.

Milkman666 said @ 2:08am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:3]
Its all fun and games until someone is told to bite the curb. Can you blame Mr Romper Stomper though? Poor bastard has been told his very way of life is being threatened by these socialists/communist/fascist agents, these liberal bogeymen. I can imagine how he felt in the heat of the moment, surrounded by his peers, circling the outsider, the invader who threatens the homestead. Then bam! Righteousness. Its not a unique situation, and it shouldn't be a suprise considering how the GOP has decided to rally their base.

I feel bad for the legitimate conservatives, they have no real home. Oh and by the way, NPR has received a bomb threat.

danshyu said @ 8:38am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:2 Underrated]
Swap that speech with Islam. And you sound exactly like the type of people on the far right. Oh the irony.

Nihil said @ 2:10pm GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Informative]
You are a poisonous cunt and your moral high horse is a nag.

Menchi said @ 2:08pm GMT on 27th Oct
Sure, you've repudiated his actions, but you didn't denounce or refudiate them, so I'm afraid we can't accept your intentions as genuine.

danshyu said @ 1:40pm GMT on 26th Oct
Oh Kentucky, you don't disappoint do you.

Nostrildamus said @ 1:46pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:5 Underrated]
Fuckin' brownshirts.

smoug said @ 7:53pm GMT on 26th Oct
I like to think that Americans are past that sort of behavior. That we're not going to regress to having thugs shoving and threatening voters outside polling places or spreading outright lies to rile people to violence against political rivals.

But incidents like this repeatedly remind me that it doesn't take much to get to that point all over again.

structured_spirits said @ 9:14pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Underrated]
I think you're wrong about that. I think that we're pretty much there right now.

sanepride said @ 9:44pm GMT on 26th Oct
I know. The same people who call Obama a nazi.

atter_cob said @ 11:44pm GMT on 26th Oct

loomspace said @ 2:24pm GMT on 26th Oct

bigjohnson said @ 9:06pm GMT on 26th Oct
beat me to it

maryyugo said @ 3:16pm GMT on 26th Oct
Uh... waiting for Libertarians to join in... in one... two...

Spleen23 said @ 3:51pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:3 Funny]
It the hand of the market that's invisible.
The foot belongs to a all too visible, ageing, slack jawed misogynist.

Krutz said @ 5:22pm GMT on 26th Oct
Let's see... Libertarians caught not only suppressing freedom, but doing so by force?

Default rebuttal: Those weren't real Libertarians, so we should go back to the gold standard and repeal the ADA.

LethalFlatulence said @ 7:32pm GMT on 26th Oct
She could have defended herself if she had a gun.

Eon Bleu said @ 5:07am GMT on 27th Oct
And if everyone had guns, they would have riddled her with bullets.

Naruki said @ 5:31am GMT on 27th Oct
Clearly you are unaware of the NRA slogan meta-meme.

Barnabas_Truman said @ 5:00am GMT on 28th Oct
Clearly you've never been to Singapore.

Naruki said @ 1:26am GMT on 29th Oct
Good point, but I don't think that's where this took place.

CompletelyIrrelevant said @ 12:55am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:3 Funny]
You don't understand. It's not real violence... they weren't taxing her

Naruki said @ 1:09am GMT on 27th Oct
Saint_Marck, where the fuck is that +1 Funsightful mod you lazy bastard?!

cb361 said @ 10:35pm GMT on 27th Oct
Saint_Marck, where the fuck is ~~that +1 Funsightful mod~~ you ~~lazy bastard~~?!

-_- said @ 3:33pm GMT on 26th Oct

-_- said @ 3:44pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Insightful]
Oops, I didn't realize there was a whole post dedicated to this video.

graham said @ 4:25pm GMT on 26th Oct
If this kind of thing were happening in any other country say, 12 years ago, Americans would be going ape-shit crazy on how fucked up that country's people were and how they had to be stopped.

Aphex808 said @ 5:45pm GMT on 26th Oct
Hell it happened a couple years ago in Iran and we went ape-shit about it.

Granted what happened in Iran was much worse but still... this evokes that. It's fucking crazy.

badgerbaiter said @ 4:40pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Insightful]
Fucking bat shit crazy Americans.

Krutz said @ 5:24pm GMT on 26th Oct
What's really disappointing is that we're not the "fun" kind of batshit crazy that apparently created the fashions and most kid TV programs in the 80's.

badgerbaiter said @ 7:31pm GMT on 26th Oct
No, these people are a lot more like the Taliban, or Maryyugo to be funny!

Krutz said @ 5:28pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:3 Underrated]
"On both sides?"

So much for at least taking some responsibility for your followers, Rand. Where's the tape of MoveOn doing anything remotely similar? If you had it, you and your drones would be demanding apologies for weeks, if not the disbanding of whatever organizations the perpetrators belonged to since 12th grade.

BergZ said @ 11:49pm GMT on 26th Oct
One side shoots up churches, murders doctors, and fakes attacks to exploit & exacerbate racial mistrust; Fuck the right-wing.

Wax said @ 6:50pm GMT on 26th Oct
Retards drunk on propaganda...

"I am angry because you do not do like I do."
"Me smash!"
"Go Wal-Mart now for new NASCAR shirt."

f00m@nB@r said @ 6:51pm GMT on 26th Oct
Update: The victim suffered a concussion and multiple sprains in the assault, according to MoveOn's political director Ilyse Hogue. Police have thus far been unable to identify the perpetrators, but because the incident was caught on multiple cameras, they hope to make significant progress in the case today. MoveOn has called on Rand Paul to explicitly condemn the attack, but so far he hasn't.

maryyugo said @ 1:41am GMT on 27th Oct
" ...but because the incident was caught on multiple cameras, they hope to make significant progress in the case today."

I'd like to see how the incident started. Any idea where that might be? The video linked to this seems to begin when the woman is already being dragged down. I'd like to see what she did beforehand if anything.

f00m@nB@r said @ 2:41am GMT on 27th Oct
You can follow the links and read an interview with her. I'm sure eyewitness accounts will come out in the next few days.

mrcucumber said @ 2:17pm GMT on 28th Oct
She must've stomped on his head before, 'cause you know, one head stomping deserves another.

paul_austin0816 said @ 7:00pm GMT on 26th Oct
well Rand Paul's not going to be much of a politician if he can't whip up a fake and half-hearted apology...wtf isn't that a requirement?

ahPook said @ 8:02pm GMT on 26th Oct
"I'm sorry if anyone was offended by the actions of my supporters."

KingPellinore said @ 8:31pm GMT on 26th Oct
Seriously? A group holds down a woman while a grown man stomps on her head and Rand Paul has the audacity to apologize "IF" anyone was offended?

structured_spirits said @ 9:49pm GMT on 26th Oct
Notice he's not apologizing that it happened, just that he's sorry it upset some people.

Krutz said @ 9:54pm GMT on 26th Oct
The "if anyone was offended" is the standard weasel non-apology. Basically, it says that no matter what was done or said or how wrong it was to say/do it, it's the injured/offended person's fault for, well, being the target.

f00m@nB@r said @ 10:03pm GMT on 26th Oct
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/paul-condemns-kentucky-attack-suggests-he-knows-stompers-identity.php

Paul has now outright condemned the act, and distanced himself from the assailant who is a former volunteer for his campaign, while still retaining the weasel statement urging "both sides" to remain civil.

"The Paul for Senate campaign is extremely disappointed in, and condemns the actions of a supporter last night outside the KET debate," the statement reads. "Whatever the perceived provocation, any level of aggression or violence is deplorable, and will not be tolerated by our campaign.

The Paul campaign has disassociated itself from the volunteer who took part in this incident, and once again urges all activists -- on both sides -- to remember that their political passions should never manifest themselves in physical altercations of any kind."

Aphex808 said @ 11:46pm GMT on 26th Oct [Score:1 Underrated]
A few points:

1. It wasn't an 'incident', it was a fucking assault.

2. It wasn't 'a volunteer', people were holding her down. One of them was a tea party activist who has also been identified.

3. Rand Paul's a shithead weasel.

I don't agree with the guy's politics, but at least I could respect a reasonable response.

This, my friends, is not a reasonable response.

Naruki said @ 12:05am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Insightful]
Yeah, it's a bit like saying you condemn a rapist's attack on a victim, and then admonish both parties not to rape.

f00m@nB@r said @ 9:57pm GMT on 26th Oct
The assailant: "I'm sorry that it came to that, and I apologize if it appeared overly forceful, but I was concerned about Rand's safety."

Because a single 23-year old woman is a serious physical threat.

f00m@nB@r said @ 9:57pm GMT on 26th Oct
Source:
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/kentucky-stomper-identified-as-pauls-now-former-bourbon-county-coordinator.php

structured_spirits said @ 10:08pm GMT on 26th Oct
Also, the other guy already had her on the ground completely immobilized, the head kick was just thrown in for fun as it were.

Krutz said @ 11:05pm GMT on 26th Oct
So it's the "it's coming right for us" defense?

sanepride said @ 11:07pm GMT on 26th Oct
Can't be too careful

structured_spirits said @ 11:39pm GMT on 26th Oct
Hitler had Ava Braun,
Manson had Squeaky Fromme,
Ted Bundy got lots of dates,
I wonder what I'm doing wrong.
I don't pretend to understand women's little quirks
Just one thing I know for sure - chicks dig jerks, yeah.

tronsgit said @ 10:28pm GMT on 26th Oct

f00m@nB@r said @ 1:08am GMT on 27th Oct
So, the stomper appeared in a Rand Paul ad. Seems likely the campaign staff if not Paul himself recognized him from the video. Yet, did not volunteer the info to the cops.

King of the Hill said @ 1:09am GMT on 27th Oct
Well.. Looks like the assaults went both ways that night.

http://www.kypost.com/dpps/news/political/2-fights-break-out-during-paul_conway-debate-_5305909

Anybody going to blast the liberal who stomped on this lady's foot?

papango said @ 1:14am GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Insightful]
According to that article a woman fell down and was stepped on and then someone stepped on someone else's foot. I'm not sure what you want me to get excited about, this article suggests all that happened to anybody (on both sides) was a bit of jostling.

King of the Hill said @ 4:29am GMT on 27th Oct
Nowhere in that article is that mentioned.

She has filed an assault report just like the moveon.org woman did.

papango said @ 4:49am GMT on 27th Oct
Is what mentioned? Both incidents are mentioned in this article and both are described as people being stepped on. The moveon.org women is described as falling and being stepped on, the Rand supporter is described as having her foot stepped on. Both incidents sound really minor in this article.

f00m@nB@r said @ 4:31pm GMT on 27th Oct
If you can't tell the difference between a group of men chasing and then holding a young woman down on the ground and stomping on her head, versus a woman stepping on another woman's foot in a crowd, you really need to get into a remedial ethics and morality class.

King of the Hill said @ 4:36pm GMT on 27th Oct
Get your eyes checked and watch the video again. Then come over and I will demonstrate stomping to you.

KingPellinore said @ 5:36pm GMT on 27th Oct
That's two people, the other being me, that you've offered to "stomp".

You are truly a credit to your party.

King of the Hill said @ 2:27am GMT on 28th Oct
Yep.. Us independents are on to something.

KingPellinore said @ 7:06pm GMT on 28th Oct
You aren't independent. You just have the good sense to be emarassed to refer to yourself as a conservative in mixed company.

f00m@nB@r said @ 5:54pm GMT on 27th Oct
You forgot the chasing and holding down.

f00m@nB@r said @ 5:58pm GMT on 27th Oct
You're equating a group of men chasing and holding down a woman, while another guy holds her down and steps on her head to one person stepping on another person's foot.

REALLY?

f00m@nB@r said @ 6:04pm GMT on 27th Oct
They stomped hard enough to cause a fuckin' concussion: that fact is corroborated by a physician.

Don't fuckin' tell me that was not stomping.

REALLY?

Remember your own words here when your daughter is in college, participating in some protest or other.

mrcucumber said @ 2:21pm GMT on 28th Oct [Score:-1 Troll]
Yeah, she might stomp on somebody's head.

mrcucumber said @ 6:04pm GMT on 28th Oct [Score:-1]
I'm sorry. Accidentally slip and place a foot on somebody's neck, and then head. Accidentally, of course.

happiest_sadist said @ 2:39am GMT on 28th Oct
Internet Tough Guy is tough.

Naruki said @ 1:17am GMT on 27th Oct
You're going to need a less retarded link KotH. Preferably one with, what's that word? Oh yeah, detail.

From that site, it looks like the head stomping incident was merely a case of "restraint by foot". Nevermind the item you refer to being tossed out as simply stepping on someone's foot, with no mention of intent or proof, etc.

Gee, could someone step on someone's foot on purpose? Sure. By accident? Well no, that could never ever happen in a billion years, and since the earth is only 6000 years old, it can't happen. Right?

Get back to us when you have something credible and informative and I'll be happy to condemn it.

King of the Hill said @ 4:28am GMT on 27th Oct
"The woman was wearing a surgical boot, but after the injury, her incision was cut open. Police say she refused medical treatment and also filed an assault report."

Generally people don't file reports of assault unless something was intentional. Same thing the moveon.org woman did. What makes this any different?

papango said @ 4:55am GMT on 27th Oct
Filing an assault report doesn't prove it was intentional, it just shows the victims thinks it was intentional.

The article you've provided makes both incidents sound very minor.

Naruki said @ 5:36am GMT on 27th Oct
Seriously, what the fuck is KotH smoking? Did he not even read his own fucking article?

I found this article to be a bit more informative about the head stomping incident.

It talks about how they planned to get them a nigger, so to speak. (Hope I'm not reaching too far back for stereotype language, there.)

They actually intimidated her first, then chased her when she tried to get away from them, then assaulted her. And they aren't going to be charged with a felony! This stinks all the way around.

King of the Hill said @ 4:38pm GMT on 27th Oct
Wow... Huff Post. I guess we'll take the victim's own words for it and call it case closed. She doesn't have a history of stirring the pot or anything...

KingPellinore said @ 12:29pm GMT on 27th Oct
I haven't seen any video of the woman getting her foot stepped on, but I have seen the video of the MoveOn.org woman being forced to the ground while a man identified as Tim Proffitt deliberately stomps on her head. It's actually a scary video to watch, seeing that much willful violence in just a few seconds.

King of the Hill said @ 4:33pm GMT on 27th Oct
He doesn't stomp. He steps on her shoulder to pin her and his foot seems to slip over and down onto her neck when he uses too much force. Pretty fucking stupid thing for him to do and he shouldn't have touched her... Period. It seems everyone is sensationalizing it into a stomp direct to her neck/head. If that is the case, please come over and I'll demonstrate what a stomp is.

KingPellinore said @ 5:38pm GMT on 27th Oct
If I'm prone and restrained on the ground and your foot comes into purposeful contact with my body, especially my head, it's either a kick or a stomp. End of story.

Naruki said @ 7:26pm GMT on 27th Oct
Naw, since you are the one who doesn't understand, you are the one who needs the tactile demonstration. I'm sure we can find a number of volunteers to educate you.

KingPellinore said @ 7:31pm GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Underrated]
I swear, even when I agree with you I want to slap you.

cb361 said @ 10:51pm GMT on 27th Oct [Score:1 Funny]
Naruki Syndrome.

Naruki said @ 12:30am GMT on 28th Oct
Like a sort of reverse Stockholm.

King of the Hill said @ 2:26am GMT on 28th Oct
Well, as usual the SE liberal mob circle jerks all over someone who doesn't quite see it the way they do..No surprise there at all.

KingPellinore said @ 3:38am GMT on 28th Oct
Just how many viewpoints to seeing a woman's head stomped on concrete are there?

CompletelyIrrelevant said @ 7:29am GMT on 28th Oct [Score:4 Funny]
If you watch it in reverse, they help her up off the ground and introduce her to Rand Paul...

King of the Hill said @ 4:34pm GMT on 27th Oct
Then I guess the guy who had his foot on the moveon.org woman did so unintentionally.

KingPellinore said @ 5:47pm GMT on 27th Oct [Score:3 Insightful]
Well, she was being held down and he has his full attention directed toward her, so we can rule out the possibility that he was unaware of her proximity to him and her position in relation to his feet.

After becoming acutely aware of where she is, he proceeds to lift his foot (and this part is important) while looking straight at her and bring it down on her shoulder with sufficient force as to qualify a "stomp". His foot then slides past her shoulder and strikes her head, which is on the pavement, also with enough force to be called a "stomp".

In all, at least two grown men restrained this woman while another struck her while she was on the ground. If you're seriously making excuses for these three cowardly pieces of shit, I hope you have a big dick because you're going to need it when you go fuck yourself.

f00m@nB@r said @ 5:56pm GMT on 27th Oct

two grown men restrained this woman while another struck her while she was on the ground

KotH seems to be missing this point.

Milkman666 said @ 10:11pm GMT on 27th Oct

King of the Hill said @ 2:25am GMT on 28th Oct
No really. Go fuck yourself and practice some reading comprehension.

I never once advocated that what they did was right. NEVER.

KingPellinore said @ 2:42am GMT on 28th Oct
Nobody's saying you said it was right. What you did say was that it was "unintentional" and that it didn't qualify as a stomp. By minimizing this heinous act of violence, you defend these thugs. And thus, may go fuck yourself.

Naruki said @ 5:37am GMT on 27th Oct
Generally people don't file reports of assault unless something was intentional.

Are you smoking crack? Isn't a statement that asinine still embarrassing to you? How high are you that you can say it with a straight face?

King of the Hill said @ 4:29pm GMT on 27th Oct
If you accidentally step on my foot, it is generally pretty obvious that it was an accident.

If you step on my foot with malice intended I'm going to know the difference.

...And so would you.

I'm sorry you don't seem to care much about it. You'd rather make hay out of the moveon.org chick who by all accounts was intentionally inciting a reaction from Rand supporters. I don't condone what was done to her either by the way. I just don't condone willful ignorance on your part of the other assault that happened that night.

...Or the willful ignorance of the assault of Kenneth Gladney at a town hall meeting a year ago where SEIU union thugs beat him up. I guess you don't care much about violence when it is your side of the issues dishing it out.

f00m@nB@r said @ 4:34pm GMT on 27th Oct
'inciting a reaction'? You're an asshole. Holding a porter invites a head stomp?

King of the Hill said @ 4:53pm GMT on 27th Oct
http://www.lpso.net/pressrelease.asp?id=927

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/en/media-center/news-releases/charge-bp-not-greenpeace/

http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20100524/HURBLOG/100529657?p=1&tc=pg

http://itsgettinghotinhere.org/2008/04/01/billionaires-for-dirty-energy-blockade-and-lockdown-at-citi-hq-in-midtown-nyc/

Ok... I'm an asshole. She obviously likes to create havoc in order to draw attention to her pet issues. It seems that she was indeed purposely putting herself in a bad place the other night. Again... I agree she was assaulted but not to the degree it is being made out to be and I do believe she agitated her own assault. I have no problem being called an asshole on this. I know what site I'm on.

Naruki said @ 12:34am GMT on 28th Oct
So you think it's okay to curb stomp a bitch who expresses her opinion about a political figure? Which you do routinely. Okay...

I am going to enter that as exhibit A in my trial. "But yerhonor, he said it's okay to curb stomp someone for using their 1st Amendment rights. That's why he's now King of the Gutterbleeders."

Naruki said @ 7:30pm GMT on 27th Oct [Score:-2 Flamebait]
If you accidentally step on my foot, it is generally pretty obvious that it was an accident.
Only if you are omniscient, dumbass. And you clearly are not.

If you step on my foot with malice intended I'm going to know the difference.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. I wouldn't step on your foot, though. If I were going to deliberately initiate violence on you, it would be terminal because I know you might retaliate. And you wouldn't know it was intentional then because you'd be terminated.

You place a lot of certainty on your omniscience, and that's what makes you look so fucking stupid to the rest of us.

The rest of your lying post I'll not bother with, since you are clearly making shit up and outright lying about my positions.

tldr: Fuck you, you lying asswipe.

f00m@nB@r said @ 2:42am GMT on 27th Oct
Yeah... no.

happiest_sadist said @ 2:56am GMT on 28th Oct

From here:

http://www.zug.com/live/84490/The-Tea-Party-Prank-How-I-Got-My-Butt-Kicked-Literally-Just-a-Few-Feet-Away-From-Sarah-Palin.html