Thursday, 15 May 2008

Giving Up the Golf

quote [ The great Bushian sacrifice — an Army private loses a leg, a Marine loses half his skull, 4,000 of their brothers and sisters lose their lives — and you lose golf, and they have to pull you off the golf course to get you to just do that? ]

Yeah, I know-- more Keith Olbermann. This one, however, had me pumping my fist Arsenio style. If you don't want to watch the whole thing, at least skip to the end to hear him tell GWB to "SHUT THE HELL UP."

Transcript in the extended.

President Bush has resorted anew to the sleaziest fear-mongering and mass manipulation of an administration and public life dedicated to realizing the lowest of our expectations. And he has now applied these poisons to the 2008 presidential election, on behalf of the party at whose center he and John McCain lurk.

Mr. Bush has predicted that the election of a Democratic president could "eventually lead to another attack on the United States." This ludicrous, infuriating, holier-than-thou and most importantly bone-headedly wrong statement came during a May 13 interview with Politico.com and online users of Yahoo

The question was phrased as follows: "If we were to pull out of Iraq next year, what's the worst that could happen, what's the doomsday scenario?"

The president replied: "Doomsday scenario of course is that extremists throughout the Middle East would be emboldened, which would eventually lead to another attack on the United States. The biggest issue we face is, it's bigger than Iraq, it's this ideological struggle against cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives."

Mr. Bush, at long last, has it not dawned on you that the America you have now created, includes "cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives?" They are those in — or formerly in — your employ, who may yet be charged some day with war crimes.

Through your haze of self-congratulation and self-pity, do you still have no earthly clue that this nation has laid waste to Iraq to achieve your political objectives? "This ideological struggle," Mr. Bush, is taking place within this country.

It is a struggle between Americans who cherish freedom, ours and everybody else's, and Americans like you, sir, to whom freedom is just a brand name, just like "Patriot Act" is a brand name or "Protect America" is a brand name.

But wait, there's more: You also said "Iraq is the place where al-Qaida and other extremists have made their stand and they will be defeated." They made no "stand" in Iraq, sir, you allowed them to assemble there!

As certainly as if that were the plan, the borders were left wide open by your government's farcical post-invasion strategy of "they'll greet us as liberators." And as certainly as if that were the plan, the inspiration for another generation of terrorists in another country was provided by your government's farcical post-invasion strategy of letting the societal infra-structure of Iraq dissolve, to be replaced by an American viceroy, enforced by merciless mercenaries who shoot unarmed Iraqis and then evade prosecution in any country by hiding behind your skirts, sir.

Terrorism inside Iraq is your creation, Mr. Bush!

It was a Yahoo user who brought up the second topic upon whose introduction Mr. Bush should have passed, or punted, or gotten up and left the room claiming he heard Dick Cheney calling him.

"Do you feel," asked an ordinary American, "that you were misled on Iraq?"

"I feel like — I felt like, there were weapons of mass destruction," the president said. "You know, 'mislead' is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional — I don't think so, I think there was a — not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was."

Flawed.

You, Mr. Bush, and your tragically know-it-all minions, threw out every piece of intelligence that suggested there were no such weapons.

You, Mr. Bush, threw out every person who suggested that the sober, contradictory, reality-based intelligence needed to be listened to, and fast.

You, Mr. Bush, are responsible for how "intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment." You and the sycophants you dredged up and put behind the most important steering wheel in the world propagated palpable nonsense and shoved it down the throat of every intelligence community across the world and punished anybody who didn't agree it was really chicken salad.

And you, Mr. Bush, threw under the bus, all of the subsequent critics who bravely stepped forward later to point out just how much of a self-fulfilling prophecy you had embraced, and adopted as this country's policy in lieu of, say, common sense.

The fiasco of pre-war intelligence, sir, is your fiasco.

You should build a great statue of yourself turning a deaf ear to the warnings of realists, while you are shown embracing the three-card monte dealers like Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney.

That would be a far more fitting tribute to your legacy, Mr. Bush, than this presidential library you are constructing as a giant fable about your presidency, an edifice you might as well claim was built from "Iraqi weapons of mass destruction" because there will be just as many of those inside your presidential library as there were inside Saddam Hussein's Iraq.


Of course if there is one overriding theme to this president's administration it is the utter, always-failing, inability to know when to quit when it is behind. And so Mr. Bush answered yet another question about this layered, nuanced, wheels-within-wheels garbage heap that constituted his excuse for war.

"And so you feel that you didn't have all the information you should have or the right spin on that information?"

"No, no," replied the President. "I was told by people, that they had weapons of mass destruction …"

People? What people? The insane informant "Curveball?" The Iraqi snake-oil salesman Ahmed Chalabi? The American snake-oil salesman Dick Cheney?

"I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction, as were members of Congress, who voted for the resolution to get rid of Saddam Hussein.

"And of course, the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes."

Mr. Bush, you destroyed the evidence that contradicted the resolution you jammed down the Congress's throat, the way you jammed it down the nation's throat. When required by law to verify that your evidence was accurate, you simply resubmitted it, with phrases amounting to "See, I done proved it" virtually written in the margins in crayon.

You defied patriotic Americans to say "The Emperor Has No Clothes," only with the stakes — as you and the mental dwarves in your employ put it — being a "mushroom cloud over an American city."

And as a final crash of self-indulgent nonsense, when the incontrovertible truth of your panoramic and murderous deceit has even begun to cost your political party seemingly perpetual congressional seats in places like North Carolina and Mississippi, you can actually say with a straight face, sir, that for members of Congress "the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes" — while you greet the political heat and try to run and hide from your presidency, and your legacy — 4,000 of the Americans you were supposed to protect — dead in Iraq, with your only feeble, pathetic answer being, "I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction."

Then came Mr. Bush's final blow to our nation's solar plexus, his last reopening of our common wounds, his last remark that makes the rest of us question not merely his leadership or his judgment but his very suitably to remain in office.

"Mr. President," he was asked, "you haven't been golfing in recent years. Is that related to Iraq?"

"Yes," began perhaps the most startling reply of this nightmarish blight on our lives as Americans on our history. "It really is. I don't want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the Commander in Chief playing golf. I feel I owe it to the families to be as — to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal."

Golf, sir? Golf sends the wrong signal to the grieving families of our men and women butchered in Iraq? Do you think these families, Mr. Bush, their lives blighted forever, care about you playing golf? Do you think, sir, they care about you?

You, Mr. Bush, let their sons and daughters be killed. Sir, to show your solidarity with them you gave up golf? Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn't give up your pursuit of this insurance-scam, profiteering, morally and financially bankrupting war.

Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn't even give up talking about Iraq, a subject about which you have incessantly proved without pause or backwards glance, that you may literally be the least informed person in the world?

Sir, to show your solidarity with them, you didn't give up your presidency? In your own words "solidarity as best as I can" is to stop a game? That is the "best" you can do?

Four thousand Americans give up their lives and your sacrifice was to give up golf! Golf. Not "Gulf" — golf.

And still it gets worse. Because it proves that the president's unendurable sacrifice, his unbearable pain, the suspension of getting to hit a ball with a stick, was not even his own damned idea.

"Mr. President, was there a particular moment or incident that brought you to that decision, or how did you come to that?"

"I remember when [diplomat Sergio Vieira] de Mello, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man's life. And I was playing golf, I think I was in central Texas, and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, it's just not worth it any more to do."

Your one, tone-deaf, arrogant, pathetic, embarrassing gesture, and you didn't even think of it yourself? The great Bushian sacrifice — an Army private loses a leg, a Marine loses half his skull, 4,000 of their brothers and sisters lose their lives — and you lose golf, and they have to pull you off the golf course to get you to just do that?

If it's even true.

Apart from your medical files, which dutifully record your torn calf muscle and the knee pain which forced you to give up running at the same time — coincidence, no doubt — the bombing in Baghdad which killed Sergio Vieira de Mello of the U.N. and interrupted your round of golf was on Aug. 19, 2003.

Yet CBS News has records of you playing golf as late as Oct. 13 of that year, nearly two months later.

Mr. Bush, I hate to break it to you 6 1/2 years after you yoked this nation and your place in history to the wrong war, in the wrong place, against the wrong people, but the war in Iraq is not about you.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your grief when American after American comes home in a box.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about what your addled brain has produced in the way of paranoid delusions of risks that do not exist, ready to be activated if some Democrat, and not your twin Mr. McCain, succeeds you.

The war in Iraq, your war, Mr. Bush, is about how you accomplished the derangement of two nations, and how you helped funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to lascivious and perennially thirsty corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater, and how you sent 4,000 Americans to their deaths for nothing.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your golf game! And, sir, if you have any hopes that next Jan. 20 will not be celebrated as a day of soul-wrenching, heart-felt thanksgiving, because your faithless stewardship of this presidency will have finally come to a merciful end, this last piece of advice:

When somebody asks you, sir, about Democrats who must now pull this country back from the abyss you have placed us at ...

When somebody asks you, sir, about the cooked books and faked threats you foisted on a sincere and frightened nation …

When somebody asks you, sir, about your gallant, noble, self-abnegating sacrifice of your golf game so as to soothe the families of the war dead.

This advice, Mr. Bush: SHUT. THE HELL. UP.



[politics] [by leswilkerson@1:53pmGMT] [+10 Good]

Comments

Saint_Marck said @ 2:10pm GMT on 15th May [Score:2]
I want to get drunk enough I can't really understand him, and then just stomp around and shake my fist to his rant.
f00m@nB@r said @ 2:20pm GMT on 15th May
haha ha ha
SkySyke said @ 2:12pm GMT on 15th May
I don't think the TV has made me physically ill before this day.

Bravo, Bush. You've done it again.
lilmookieesquire said @ 2:43pm GMT on 15th May
Did you try turning it on before?
SkySyke said @ 4:21pm GMT on 15th May
As little as possible
sanepride said @ 2:12pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Underrated]
He does outrage and indignation real good.
Saint_Marck said @ 2:14pm GMT on 15th May
Someone should pay him to do it!
sanepride said @ 2:23pm GMT on 15th May
Fuck that. Someone should pay me to do it.
BlutStein1984 said @ 2:23pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Insightful]
*screams, thrashes, foams at the mouth*

Now that was good Two Minutes Hate.

themindtaker said @ 5:49pm GMT on 15th May
I mod that doubleplus good.
skoob666 said @ 4:34am GMT on 16th May
Now I wanna go have sex with a girl half my age then be mercilessly tortured for it.
Baxter_UK said @ 7:10am GMT on 16th May
Yes, I too want to do half of what you just said!
mister said @ 2:32pm GMT on 15th May
Keith Olbermann is THE MAN!
Periander said @ 2:40pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Informative]
His best rant in quite a while.
Vibrating @ the Speed of Light said @ 2:47pm GMT on 15th May [Score:-5 Troll]
What a fucking moonbat.
mao tse helen said @ 2:52pm GMT on 15th May [Score:3 Funny]
Yeah, I know. The way he says things and sits and is on television. I'd like to have a spider-shooting orifice installed on my body so I could use it to shoot spiders at him. That'd show him who rules.
mao tse helen said @ 2:54pm GMT on 15th May
I'd like to add that they should get Mr. Belding from Saved By the Bell to have his own show. I don't know what his opinions are, but Zack turned out okay. Homeboy even went to college and Hawaii and shit.
Spyike said @ 10:11pm GMT on 15th May
Yeah but Screech...
mao tse helen said @ 5:36am GMT on 16th May
What happened to Screech and Jessie was solely the fault of that old skank Miss Bliss.
ring riot said @ 10:08pm GMT on 15th May
You're right, Aktung. Bush is a fucking moonbat.
sanepride said @ 8:30am GMT on 16th May
Instead of calling Olberman a 'moonbat' maybe he should try to defend Bush. But that would take some effort. A LOT of effort.
BlutStein1984 said @ 9:41am GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Insightful]
The only way to defend Bush is to prove he is really Andy Kaufman.
mky said @ 9:58am GMT on 16th May
Or that Kaufman was really Bush?
Naruki said @ 6:00pm GMT on 16th May
Damn, my new boss sounds just like motherfucking Latka.
valen85 said @ 2:53pm GMT on 15th May
he sorta says what we're all thinking but puts emotion to it
Hemiii said @ 2:53pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Insightful]
It's really sad that we live in a country where the only muckraking you get are from editorial blow-hards like this asshole.

That said, I like Olbermann and I usually completely agree with him. But he's a fucking asshole, just like O Reilly. Why do we confuse Editorial with News?
leswilkerson said @ 2:55pm GMT on 15th May
I definitely do not. I know Olbermann's show is an hour of editorial.
Hemiii said @ 3:08pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Underrated]
Most people know that Olbermann is editorial, wheras I really do believe that most people that watch O Reilly or listen to Limbaugh think of it as news. I have several family members that attest to this fact.
kichijoii said @ 3:06pm GMT on 15th May
"Mr. Bush has predicted that the election of a Democratic president could "eventually lead to another attack on the United States.""

Funny, since the last attack on the United States occurred after the election of a Republican president. Perhaps he means the Republicans will attack if they do not get their way.
themindtaker said @ 6:01pm GMT on 15th May
You're probably right, republicans (despite the ludicrous flag pins) often seem to love their party more than they do the U.S.

Though it bears mentioning Al Qaeda almost certainly had to start planning an attack the likes of 9/11 many years before it got off the ground (no pun intended). I can't imagine they give a shit about American partisan political parties or who happened to be in the White House when they got their opportunity.

Now whether or not the Bush White House had the proper intelligence to stop the attack is a completely different issue... though I don't get into 9/11 conspiracy theories either-- I'd much rather read JFK assassination theories. :)
Dioxin said @ 3:22pm GMT on 15th May
The iron turtle
Belching in indignation
Sets itself on fire
themindtaker said @ 5:52pm GMT on 15th May
An obtuse comment
Aimed at the social elite

...Haikus can be hard
Dioxin said @ 7:03pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Funny]
What obtuse comment?
I thought this was a fart joke.

...with Keith Olbermann.
lilmookieesquire said @ 12:04am GMT on 16th May
I think the fart joke,
was posted before this one.
she was a keyboard turner.
RuneLancer said @ 12:30pm GMT on 16th May
No no, that's all wrong.
Five syllables, seven, then five.
Fix your damned haiku.
Naruki said @ 5:48pm GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Informative]
"Haiku" has 3
Syllables, not 2, so fix
Your damn meter, ass.
Naruki said @ 5:55pm GMT on 16th May
Woe is me, a tard.
Moderate/reply is sooooooo
Easy, yet I failed.
TheFurnace said @ 7:12pm GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Underrated]
English syllables
And the Japanese mora
Do not always match
Dioxin said @ 12:49am GMT on 17th May
The stern conductor
Loudly proclaims his rhythm
To a herd of cats
taiga said @ 3:30pm GMT on 15th May
Whether he writes these special comments himself, or if he has a team, they are some of the most eloquent anger that I have heard in a while.

I aspire to one day be able to express myself in a similar manner. Unfortunately, I often lack the attention span to give a concentrated rant, and instead lose interest in my anger rather quickly.
Komrade said @ 3:49pm GMT on 15th May
I just scream and yell a lot. That usually does the trick.
blackpsypher said @ 3:59pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Insightful]
I do not think that George W. Bush is a bad man. I think he is a simpleton who is being led by those who wish to use him as a shield against their own actions.

As such, nothing that he says surprises me, and to lash out against him is to lash out against a child who uses a word which they heard on a playground in an attempt to make themselves look bigger in the eyes of those around them.

While I do agree with what mister Olbermann is saying, I feel as though it only reinforces what those around Mr Bush are trying to do: achieve their own ends while placing the blame for their actions on a man who has neither the capacity nor the compulsion to try to stand against those who are using the supposed leader of the free world to achieve their own ends.
Naruki said @ 7:25am GMT on 16th May
You don't think Dahmer is a bad man, either.
mky said @ 9:20am GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Bush may very well be the stupidest person ever to be the US President, heck he may even be the stupidest person to lead ANY country, and so you do have a point. Nonetheless, it is NOT for the US presidnt to be stupid, nor any leader.

LEADER: one who leads. If he is that stupid that he is incapable of leading then he should be faulted for that. Sure it may be cruel to pick on the idiot, but an idiot should not be president of the US. He is furthermore seemeingly oblvious to his stupidity, heck even the "clinically retarded" know they are slow.
foobar said @ 6:08pm GMT on 15th May
Who's he going to yell at when the Republicans are out of power?
Nostrildamus said @ 6:52pm GMT on 15th May
Sshhh!
Dioxin said @ 7:03pm GMT on 15th May
One thing at a time.
RhesusMonkey said @ 8:58pm GMT on 15th May
Well, to be honest, I'd be really happy to see him spend the next eight years periodically calling Obama to task for stupid shit that he will no doubt say. The past history of the media using kid gloves when dealing with GWB should end with his presidency, regardless of who is elected next.
BlutStein1984 said @ 12:27am GMT on 16th May
Oh don't worry, the Democrats will give him plenty of material. Think about it, have you ever experienced a White House that didn't piss you off from time to time?
KingPellinore said @ 3:15am GMT on 16th May
I was born in 1979, so technically, I experienced the last 3 months of the Carter Administration.

He didn't piss me off too bad.
sacrelicious said @ 3:25am GMT on 16th May
I was born on january the 19th, 1977, so technically I experienced the last day of the ford administration. I am not now better off than I was then.
EPT said @ 9:40am GMT on 16th May
Well, you had ready access to titty back then, didn't you?
BergZ said @ 8:02pm GMT on 15th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Now watch this drive?
TheFurnace said @ 8:36pm GMT on 15th May
Goddamn I hate that moron (GWB), and it makes me sick to think that most of the people I am surrounded by voted for him.
mky said @ 9:30am GMT on 16th May
WHOOO!! that was fun. I'm going to burn that to a CD and drive around blasting that all long weekend long.

(okay maybe not, since "driving around" for no good reason wastes increasingly expensive petrol, but you get the idea...)

I'll admit that KO can come off a bit strident and blowhardy (not a real word) but at least he has the advantage of being right.

+1 Howard Beale

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.




Members

Registered: 22729

Classifieds

BOOBLE
Search sites, pics, movies, personals.


Best Porn
Reviews of the best porn sites with pics, vids, scene desription and member area preview


LONELY GUYS
Meet Women Near You